HBO Max Is Sacrificing Its Credibility to Vertical Video

HBO Max's push into vertical short-form clips undermines its brand by putting addictive scrolling ahead of real discovery.

Entertainment
HBO Max Is Sacrificing Its Credibility to Vertical Video
HBO Max Is Sacrificing Its Credibility to Vertical Video · Photo: Salon

HBO Max has added a vertical video tab. You open a service you pay for, and it presents you with a column of short clips to thumb through, which is precisely the motion you make on the services you do not pay for.

Everyone is doing it

It is not the first. Netflix has a version. Prime Video has a version. The strategic reasoning is identical everywhere and it is not stupid: the competition is no longer other subscription services, it is YouTube Shorts and TikTok and Instagram, and those platforms are winning the only fight that actually matters, which is over the twenty minutes before somebody falls asleep.

If you are a streaming executive watching that time migrate to a free product, building a feed of your own is the obvious response. The question is what you put in it.

Clips that go nowhere

Scrolling through, you get a scene from "Neighborhood Watch," a fragment of "Something the Lord Made," a stretch of true crime, a moment from "The Wire." All perfectly good material. None of it assembled to make you watch the thing it came from.

That is the tell. A trailer is built to sell you a film; a clip reel is built to hold you where you are. There is no obvious path from any of these fragments back to the show, no button that feels like the point of the exercise. The clip is not an advertisement for the catalog. The clip is the destination.

What HBO specifically has to lose

This costs HBO something it costs the others much less. Netflix has been a volume business for a decade and loses nothing by behaving like one; nobody has ever subscribed to Netflix because of what Netflix means.

HBO spent forty years building a brand that meant the opposite of infinite scroll — fewer things, longer, made with the assumption that the viewer would surrender attention rather than a thumb. That reputation is the only real asset the name still carries, and it is the reason the letters are still on the product after several rounds of corporate rearrangement.

Trading it for engagement metrics is a coherent decision and it may well work on the spreadsheet for a few quarters. It just means the service that spent decades insisting it was not television is now quietly conceding that it is not even a service. It is a feed with a subscription fee attached.

The likely outcome

None of this will be reversed by criticism, because the metric it is optimizing for will improve. Time in app will go up. That number will be presented in a slide, and the slide will be correct.

The thing that will not appear on the slide is the slow conversion of a premium brand into an undifferentiated one — a process with no single moment at which anybody could have said no, and no line item where the loss shows up.

First reported by Coleman Spilde for Salon, August 27, 2026. Text © Jezebel Staff. Photographs and video © Salon and its licensors, shown here by link and used for reference only.